{
  "question_id": "CG-P1B-FULL-104",
  "slug": "how-is-a-stale-check-treated-in-a-bank-reconciliation",
  "display_title": "How is a stale check treated in a bank reconciliation?",
  "format": "article-v2",
  "applies_to": {
    "countries": [
      "US"
    ],
    "frameworks": [],
    "tax_year": null,
    "platforms": []
  },
  "general_concept": false,
  "summary": "A stale check stays on the outstanding list until you deal with it; the bank's right to refuse it does not by itself end what you owe the payee. Establish whether it is stale under your state's law and your deposit agreement, then try to reach the payee. Reissue if you reach them. If you cannot, keep it outstanding until you establish no outside process governs it, then stop payment, void it and restore the liability. Record each step.",
  "body": "## What makes a check stale, and who sets the rule?\n\nA check becomes stale when it passes the point after which your bank no longer has to pay it. That point is set by the law governing your account and by your account agreement, not by your bookkeeping policy, so establish it for your own account before you label anything.\n\nIn California, the rule is in Commercial Code section 4404: a bank is under no obligation to a checking-account customer to pay a check, other than a certified check, that is presented more than six months after its date. The same section lets the bank pay it anyway: it may charge your account for a payment made after that point in good faith. So in California a stale check is one the bank may refuse, not one it must refuse.\n\nThe statute is not the last word. California Commercial Code section 4103 allows the effect of the bank-deposit provisions to be varied by agreement, within limits the section sets, so your deposit account agreement can set terms of its own. Read what your agreement says about old or stale-dated checks alongside the statute.\n\nOutside California, look up your own state's commercial code and your own agreement. Do not carry California's six-month period, or any other single period, across to an account governed by another state's law.\n\n## Why does it matter whether an old check is stale or merely outstanding?\n\nAn ordinary outstanding check needs nothing from you except patience: it was recorded, it has not cleared yet, and it will drop off the list when the payee deposits it. How ordinary outstanding checks are listed and carried is a separate question.\n\nA stale check is different in two ways that each call for action. It may never clear by itself, because the bank may refuse it when it is presented. And it may still clear, months or years later, because the bank may still pay it in good faith. An item that may never clear, and may clear without warning, cannot be left to sort itself out. Crossing the staleness line is the trigger to open a file on the item and work it to a decision.\n\n## Is the payee still owed if the bank will not pay?\n\nAssume so. Whether the bank has to pay and whether you owe the payee are separate questions answered by separate rules.\n\nSection 4404 describes what the bank owes you, its customer. It says nothing about the debt the check was written to pay. In California, that debt is addressed by Commercial Code section 3310: unless the parties agreed otherwise, when an ordinary uncertified check is taken for an obligation, the obligation is suspended, not discharged, to the extent of the check. A check that goes stale in the payee's drawer has not paid anyone. Outside California, whether the debt survives is a matter for the state law that governs that obligation, and whether a particular payee's claim is enforceable in a dispute is a question for counsel. The bookkeeping conclusion is narrow: never treat a stale check as a debt that has gone away.\n\nIn your books, treat the obligation as still owed without adding anything. The books already show the bill as settled, because the check was recorded as a payment when it was written. While the check is outstanding, the reduced cash balance and the item on the outstanding list stand in for that obligation. Do not post a second liability; the debt reappears as a payable only if you void the check.\n\n## What does an unresolved stale check do to the reconciliation?\n\nNothing visible, which is the problem. The item stays on the outstanding list and is subtracted from the bank balance every month, and the reconciliation still ties out.\n\nBut the point of reconciling is to identify differences between the books and the bank and record any needed adjustments. A long tail of old items weakens that. A check recorded but never mailed, a payment entered twice or an amount keyed wrong all look exactly like an old outstanding check. Once a dozen of them sit on the list unexamined, the reconciliation no longer shows you where the books and the bank disagree. There is a cash risk too: because the bank may still pay a stale check in good faith, an item nobody watches can leave the account without warning.\n\nReview every item that has crossed the staleness line at each reconciliation, and do not let it roll forward unexamined.\n\n## Why contact the payee before any book action?\n\nBecause every choice other than reissuing rests on one fact: you tried to reach the payee and could not. If you void first and look for the payee later, the file shows a cash adjustment made before any reason for it existed.\n\nBefore you decide anything:\n\n- Confirm the check was actually issued and sent, and to which address.\n- Check the payee's file for a current address, email and phone number.\n- Contact the payee through at least two channels, and ask whether they received the check, still hold it, or lost it.\n- Record each attempt: the date, the channel, the address or number used and the result.\n\nIf you reach the payee and the money is still owed, complete the payment. If you cannot reach them after a documented effort, the item moves to one of the dispositions below. It is not simply removed.\n\n## How do you choose between reissuing, voiding and leaving the item outstanding?\n\nUse the contact result and what your enquiry outside the books established.\n\n| Situation | Disposition | What must be true first |\n|---|---|---|\n| Payee reached and still owed | Reissue | Contact recorded; stop payment placed on the original with the bank; payee told the original will not be honored |\n| Payee not reached after documented effort, and you have established — from your state's unclaimed-property office or an adviser — that no outside process is governing the item | Void and restore the liability | Contact attempts recorded; the enquiry and its answer recorded; stop payment placed on the original with the bank; the debt set up as an open payable |\n| Payee not reached, and an outside process is governing the item, so the check stays live | Leave outstanding, flagged | Referral recorded: date, who was consulted, and what they said |\n\nPlace the stop payment in every path that takes the original check off your outstanding list. In California a customer may stop payment of an item drawn on the account by an order to the bank that describes the check and reaches the bank in time for it to act. Without it, a check voided only in your books can still clear, because the bank may pay a stale check in good faith and charge your account. If you have meanwhile paid the payee another way, the money leaves twice and the bank debit has no outstanding item to match. Put the order in writing: under California section 4403, an oral order lapses after 14 calendar days unless confirmed in writing, and a stop-payment order is effective for six months and may be renewed in writing for further six-month periods while it is still in effect. Diary the renewal date for as long as the original could still be presented. Outside California, take the duration and renewal terms of a stop-payment order from your own state's commercial code and your deposit agreement.\n\nVoiding is not the default for old items. Settle the outward question first: void only after contact has failed and you have established that no outside process is governing the item. Where one is, keep the item on the list until that process decides it.\n\n## What does each disposition do to the books?\n\nThe original check was recorded either against a bill (debit accounts payable, credit cash) or straight to an expense (debit the expense, credit cash). The disposition has to leave the obligation visible either way.\n\n**Reissue.** Void the original and record the replacement. The original leaves the outstanding list; the replacement joins it until it clears. Cash ends where it started, and the payable is settled again by the new check. For a check of 850.00 written against a bill:\n\n| Entry | Account | Debit | Credit |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Void original check | Cash | 850.00 | |\n| Void original check | Accounts payable | | 850.00 |\n| Replacement check | Accounts payable | 850.00 | |\n| Replacement check | Cash | | 850.00 |\n\n**Void and restore the liability.** Voiding a check in an accounting system usually marks the original payable as unpaid and increases cash by the amount of the voided check. That only works when there was a payable to mark. If the check was coded straight to expense, voiding it reverses the expense and leaves no liability on the books, which removes the debt. Record it again. For a check of 1,200.00 coded to contract labor:\n\n| Entry | Account | Debit | Credit |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| Void original check | Cash | 1,200.00 | |\n| Void original check | Contract labor | | 1,200.00 |\n| Restore the obligation | Contract labor | 1,200.00 | |\n| Restore the obligation | Accounts payable | | 1,200.00 |\n\nThe net effect is a debit to cash and a credit to accounts payable, and the expense stays in the period it belongs to. Date the void in the current period rather than on the original check date, so reconciliations already completed for earlier months stay as reported. The item leaves the outstanding list, and the debt sits in payables where your aging reports keep showing it. It remains owed.\n\n**Leave outstanding.** No entry. The check stays on the list with a flag, a reference to the referral and the date it will next be reviewed.\n\nThe general choice between editing, voiding, deleting and reversing an entry, and the mechanics of a voided check at reconciliation, are covered separately.\n\n## What happens if the item is never resolved?\n\nTaking a check off the outstanding list, or voiding it, does not settle the matter. Two obligations can remain. One is the payee's claim. The other can be owed to a state authority: New York's Office of the State Comptroller says the entities required to report and remit unclaimed funds include, for example, corporations, and that those funds include uncashed checks.\n\nWhich state's program applies, and what it requires and when, are decided by that state's unclaimed-property office; a payee's specific claim is a matter for counsel. Put an aged, unresolved item to them before you decide its disposition, not after you have voided it. Neither obligation is settled by a void entry.\n\n## What changes when the check was a paycheck?\n\nA check owed to an individual for wages is not a trade payable, and what you owe that person may not follow the supplier path. Do not run void-and-restore on it by default. Before you choose, confirm the treatment with your state's unclaimed-property office and with an adviser who knows your state's wage-payment law, and keep the check outstanding until they have answered.\n\n## What changes when the business, the account and the payee are in different states?\n\nThen which rule applies is itself a question. Establish which state's law governs your bank account, starting with any governing-law clause in your deposit agreement, before you apply a staleness period. Which state's unclaimed-property program reaches an unresolved item is a separate determination for the offices concerned or an adviser. Do not assume the rule of the state you operate in.\n\n## What does a disposition pass over aged checks look like?\n\nA California business reconciles its operating account as of June 30, 2026, and works through three old items on the outstanding list. Its account agreement adds no stale-check terms, so section 4404 governs.\n\n| Check | Payee, amount | Staleness assessment | Contact attempt and outcome | Disposition and why | Book effect | Evidence retained |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| 1041 | Supplier A, 850.00, against a bill | Assessed under Cal. Com. Code §4404, which turns on presentment more than six months after the check's date; six months after its date of 2025-04-15 fell on 2025-10-15 | Email and phone, 2026-07-02; reached; supplier says the check was lost | Reissue: payee reached and still owed | Void entry and replacement check 1102; 1041 leaves the list, 1102 joins it | Contact log; written stop-payment confirmation on 1041 with renewal date; supplier's email; both entries |\n| 1067 | Contractor B, 1,200.00, coded to contract labor | Assessed under Cal. Com. Code §4404; six months after its date of 2025-08-20 fell on 2026-02-20 | Letter returned undeliverable, email bounced, phone disconnected, 2026-07-02 to 2026-07-10 | Void and restore: contact failed, and the enquiry made on 2026-07-11 established that no outside process is governing this item | Void reverses the expense; restoring entry creates a payable of 1,200.00; 1067 leaves the list | Contact log with returned envelope; record of the 2026-07-11 enquiry and its answer; written stop-payment confirmation on 1067 with renewal date diaried; both entries; approval and date |\n| 1088 | Former employee C, 430.00, final wages | Assessed under Cal. Com. Code §4404; six months after its date of 2025-11-14 fell on 2026-05-14 | Letter and phone, 2026-07-03; no response | Leave outstanding, flagged: a wage check put to the state unclaimed-property office and a wage-law adviser, whose answer was that the check stays live | No entry; 1088 stays on the list | Contact log; referral record with dates and advice; next review date |\n\nBoth payees are unreachable; what separates 1067 from 1088 is what the enquiry outside the books returned for each. After the pass, the outstanding list holds one flagged item with a reason attached, and the payable for Contractor B is still on the books.\n\n## What goes in the file for each disposition?\n\nKeep enough that someone reviewing the account a year later can tell a considered decision from a balance that was written off:\n\n- **The rule applied:** the state, the statute or account term, and the date the check crossed it.\n- **The contact attempted:** each date, channel, address or number, and result.\n- **The decision:** the disposition, the criterion that selected it, the date and who approved it.\n- **The bank side:** the written stop-payment confirmation and its renewal dates.\n- **The entries:** references to the void, replacement or restoring entries.\n- **Any referral:** to whom, when, and what they said to do.\n\nAn item removed from the outstanding list without this record looks exactly like an unsupported adjustment to cash.",
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "REF::1",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=COM&sectionNum=4404",
      "title": "California Commercial Code, Section 4404",
      "publisher": "California Legislative Information",
      "published": "Amended by Stats. 1992, Ch. 914, Sec. 43. Effective January 1, 1993.",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-18T17:58:31+00:00",
      "sha256": "6a507a7891c103d6f4b658999ae4835c7658ebc68fdb5a5d4144808ebc242648",
      "supports": [
        "C1",
        "C2"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "REF::2",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=COM&sectionNum=4103",
      "title": "California Commercial Code, Section 4103",
      "publisher": "California Legislative Information",
      "published": "Amended by Stats. 1992, Ch. 914, Sec. 9. Effective January 1, 1993.",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-18T17:58:56+00:00",
      "sha256": "b157417e4c8409112dfc8cf57de460e90f957cb57be44d5a78ae6551f58f2d8f",
      "supports": [
        "C3"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "REF::3",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=COM&sectionNum=3310",
      "title": "California Commercial Code, Section 3310",
      "publisher": "California Legislative Information",
      "published": "Added by Stats. 1992, Ch. 914, Sec. 6. Effective January 1, 1993.",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-18T17:58:57+00:00",
      "sha256": "bd9b96c3e4fc875ae3df2bd351e1f67658cfbcf0f0b7245424b414b54f844b13",
      "supports": [
        "C4"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "REF::4",
      "url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=COM&sectionNum=4403",
      "title": "California Commercial Code, Section 4403",
      "publisher": "California Legislative Information",
      "published": "Amended by Stats. 1992, Ch. 914, Sec. 42. Effective January 1, 1993.",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-18T17:58:57+00:00",
      "sha256": "250686eb3c449bd7c8a34366a7b525d86fd1c6492a507346c979501ff7bc5ba7",
      "supports": [
        "C5",
        "C6",
        "C7",
        "C8"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "REF::5",
      "url": "https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/outstanding-check",
      "title": "Outstanding check definition",
      "publisher": "AccountingTools",
      "published": "June 05, 2026",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-18T17:58:57+00:00",
      "sha256": "a1eadebc5c47d721d0932a79d7c03ad3369dd07f473a3cfbbb5d6de490f7a7ff",
      "supports": [
        "C9"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "SRC::af0bcb8bb87fcd26",
      "url": "https://www.accountingtools.com/articles/bank-reconciliation",
      "title": "Bank reconciliation definition",
      "publisher": "AccountingTools, Inc.",
      "published": "Published December 17, 2025",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-08T05:18:03+00:00",
      "sha256": "652b7db4e2c5ef3dd27a656feb55b5b4c646e8875b35107d9d651503a0fb138a",
      "supports": [
        "C10"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "REF::7",
      "url": "https://www.osc.ny.gov/unclaimed-funds/reporters",
      "title": "Reporting Unclaimed Funds to New York State",
      "publisher": "Office of the New York State Comptroller",
      "published": "undated",
      "retrieved_at": "2026-09-18T17:58:58+00:00",
      "sha256": "af97fb0190f79ecfd15bae90e87dc082b043e6bfd3734bb522806608fcf3d232",
      "supports": [
        "C11",
        "C12"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "related": [
    {
      "question_id": "CG-P1B-FULL-059",
      "slug": "how-outstanding-checks-are-treated-in-a-bank-reconciliation",
      "display_title": "How are checks that have not yet cleared the bank (outstanding checks) treated in preparing a bank reconciliation, and what does that look like in an example?"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "CG-P1B-FULL-087",
      "slug": "how-voided-checks-are-handled-in-a-bank-reconciliation",
      "display_title": "How are voided checks handled in a bank reconciliation?"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "CG-MCE-019",
      "slug": "should-i-edit-void-delete-or-reverse-a-transaction-that-was-recorded-wrong",
      "display_title": "Should I edit, void, delete or reverse a transaction that was recorded wrong?"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "CG-P1B-FULL-060",
      "slug": "how-checks-are-handled-during-a-bank-reconciliation",
      "display_title": "How are checks handled or processed during a bank reconciliation?"
    },
    {
      "question_id": "CG-P1B-002",
      "slug": "what-is-a-bank-reconciliation-and-how-to-tie-the-books-to-the-bank",
      "display_title": "What is a bank reconciliation, who prepares it, and how do I tie the books to the bank (with a worked example)?"
    }
  ],
  "review_class": "consequential",
  "review_class_trigger": "claim_level_review_required",
  "provenance": {
    "author_model": "claude-opus-5",
    "reviewer_model": "claude-opus-5-5",
    "review_verdict": "ACCEPT",
    "review_source": "closure",
    "review_verdict_on_sha256": "03907a8bfa9d30a73fd230d720245ea04b976fbbac665802b1079a473f07d4c2",
    "editorial_disposition": "ACCEPT",
    "corrections": 1,
    "approved_by": null,
    "approved_at": null,
    "article_sha256": "03907a8bfa9d30a73fd230d720245ea04b976fbbac665802b1079a473f07d4c2",
    "source_map_sha256": "32826c60e2945c78c90a95a17da78b26d06ee136e183b8bd1b10bb91453a8b53",
    "transform_sha256": "e31f9de9966d28288f7d462818b8cbb791e03aee3fd160ecb835ea705d7a25a4"
  },
  "offer": "ask",
  "offer_id": null,
  "sample_target_id": null,
  "datePublished": "2026-09-24T17:07:16Z",
  "reviewed_at": "2026-09-24T17:07:16Z",
  "content_sha": "07f09484d1c77521a4a33618aba50f8984e4bc7508504cf979a4604feac492de",
  "release": "2.4.0",
  "slug_provenance": "minted at first publication",
  "question_text": "How is a stale check treated in a bank reconciliation?",
  "jsonld_types": [
    "Article"
  ],
  "related_question_ids": [
    "CG-P1B-FULL-059",
    "CG-P1B-FULL-087",
    "CG-MCE-019",
    "CG-P1B-FULL-060",
    "CG-P1B-002"
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "alias_provenance": []
}